Thursday, June 29, 2017

Terra Cycle


Terra Cycle Company that has been founded by Betsy Cotton in the year 2001 and is located in New Jersey. The company employs business practices that generate profits and also reduce the impact of businesses on the environment. This environmentally friendly approach of the company makes it different from its competitors in the industry. The main product of the company was ‘All Purpose Plant Food’ that would stimulate the growth of plants (Clow & Baack, 2012).  The company wants to decide between the two formulae for the products that it shall produce in the future.
Terra Cycle has effectively utilized the phenomenon of eco-captalism according to which the company has made an effort to be concerned about the environment and adopt practices that reduce the impact of company production on the environment to a great extent. According to the concept of eco-capitalism, the company would choose the production of a product that is profitable and also has a minimum impact on the environment (Clow & Baack, 2012). The sustainability and corporate responsibility movement of the past decade has raised the question of whether sustainable businesses can be profitable and to what degree.  Several startup companies, such as TerraCycle, Ecoist, and Simple Shoes, are working to capitalize on this movement.  In addition, well-established firms are integrating sustainability into their end-to-end business practices, including GE, HP, Microsoft, and Procter & Gamble.  In all cases, good business practices are required for a company to remain viable.  These fundamental business practices include expense management, producing a product consumers will purchase, product focus and revenue generation.
Founded in 2001, TerraCycle is a start up company created by two Princeton students who designed and sold one of the first commercially-available products made entirely from garbage (Burlingham, 2006).  CEO Tom Szaky was 19 when he created TerraCycle while competing in a business plan contest.  His first TerraCycle product was a fertilizer made of worm poop packaged in used water bottles.  In the past decade, the company has expanded into a full-scale upcycling company selling a variety of products.  Upcycling is the process of converting garbage or other discarded items into products of higher value (Miller, 2010).  Today, TerraCycle sells 50 products, such as backpacks, messenger bags, kites and insulated coolers made from candy wrappers, drink pouches, and potato chip bags destined for a landfill.  Since its inception, TerraCycle has salvaged 10 million drink pouches, 50,000 energy bar wrappers, two million bottles, and one million cookie wrappers (National Geographic, 2010).  It recently began making clocks out of discarded computer circuit boards and vinyl records.  In the summer of 2010, TerraCycle plans to release its newest product: a 30-gallon garbage can made from discarded pens (TerraCycle, 2010)
Positioning is defined as the positioning of the product in the minds of the consumers (Leadley & Forsyth, 2004). It is very important for any organization to position the brand correctly in the mind of the consumers. The consumers develop an impression or perception of the brand in their minds depending on the product attributes and perceived benefits from the purchase of such products. The products that have a perfect product positioning in the minds of the customers are likely to click well with the consumers and will have a higher brand equity and brand strength. In contrast, the products or brands that are not positioned correctly in the minds of the consumers are likely to observe low brand value, brand recognition and product demand.
The product positioning for Terra Cycle in the minds of the customers is a brand that deals in the manufacture of immovative environmentally friendly products that help consumers to contribute in protecting the environment. The company has positioned itself as an environmentally friendly brand in the minds of the consumers and the company has been well-appreciated by the consumers for its innovative and eco-friendly products through press releases. The high popularity of the brand has contributed a great deal in positioning the brand in the minds of the consumers.
The target consumers for Terra Cycle products were not commercial consumers, but the end consumers that included the individual gardeners. Terra Cycle sold its products to the retailers so as to allow retailers to sell the Terra Cycle products to the end consumers. The target consumers for Terra Cycle Products are those individuals who are involved in the gardening activity and tend to use eco-friendly products for their plants instead of other plant products that have not been produced to safeguard the environment.. The company Terra Cylce has employed benefit segmentation to reach the target consumers as consumers see the benefit of environmentally friendly products that have been produced in conditions that do not cause any harm to the environment as an advantage over other company products. The brand also uses psychographic segmentation as it targets only those individual consumers who have the hobby of gardening and have interest in environment friendly products for their plants. The company does not target commercial consumers for its products. The company uses indirect distribution channels involving large retailers to reach the end consumer.
TerraCycle has achieved this progress in 10 years through the combination of a clear mission, outstanding community involvement, social marketing, big box partnerships, strong talent acquisition, and visionary leadership.  The company’s mission is simple: to eliminate landfill waste by finding innovative and unique uses for materials that others would deem as garbage, then sell it at a price at or below the competition.  “We want to be the Wal-Mart of garbage,” says Szaky (Feldman, 2009, para. 3).
One of the financial advantages on which TerraCycle capitalizes is extremely low raw material costs.  Groups called brigades formed at schools, churches, and non-profits collect the garbage, and are paid two cents for every item collected.  Corporate sponsors such as Kraft Foods, Kellogg’s, and Nabisco pay for this donation, plus shipping costs to transport the collected garbage to TerraCycle.  In 2010, over 30,000 schools participated in the program (Latchford, 2010).  This approach to material acquisition also promotes social marketing.  When a student collects garbage to send to TerraCycle, and then purchases a TerraCycle product, they are buying something they helped create.  (Roth, 2010).
TerraCycle has also demonstrated strong community ethics.  The TerraCycle website offers access to a free curriculum series developed by the Cloud Institute targeted to three grade ranges with lessons on material cycles, biomimicry, and the difference between recycling in Nature and human-created garbage (TerraCycle, 2010).  TerraCycle also placed its factory in inner city Trenton, NJ, to capitalize on abundant labor and inexpensive real estate, but with the added benefit of providing employment in a depressed community (Burlingham, 2006).
Szaky also followed a risky product placement strategy that may be paying off.  Instead of selling to small garden stores and local retailers, he relentlessly pitched his products to big box retailers, such as Home Depot, Wal-Mart, Target, and Petco.  In 2004, he landed his first major deal selling worm poop fertilizer to Home Depot (Castellitto, 2009).  Shortly thereafter, companies interested in a more sustainable image contacted TerraCycle to request to have their discarded materials turned into products.  “This is a test of how consumers’ environmental concerns might translate into sales of sustainable products” (Brat, 2010, para. 4).  TerraCycle’s unique business and success landing big name deals propelled it into the media spotlight.  TerraCycle received the cover of Inc. Magazine in 2006 and was named “The Coolest Little Startup in America” (Burlingham, 2006).  TerraCycle was also featured on The Tonight Show, Oprah, and became a National Geographic series called Garbage Moguls (TerraCycle, 2010).
Finally, Tom Szaky is a visionary leader who inspires others to join his quest.  Eric Smith, TerraCycle vice president of sales says, “There’s an aura almost when you met the guy.  He makes you believe” in the company’s mission (Barlyn, 2007, para. 18).  In fact, Szaky was able to convince 12 seasoned business leaders to join his executive team, usually at a significant salary reduction.  (Burlingham, 2006).  “The key is having [executive candidates] believe in the dream of what you want to accomplish,” Szaky says (Barlyn, 2007, para. 15).





References


Brown, D. R. (2003). The Restaurant Manager's Handbook: How to Set Up, Operate, and Manage a Financially Successful Food Service Operation, Volume 1. Florida: Atlantic Publishing Company.
Clow, K. E., & Baack, D. (2012). Cases in Marketing Management. London: SAGE.
Lamb, C., Hair, J., & McDaniel, C. (2010). Marketing. Mason: Cengage Learning.
Leadley, P., & Forsyth, P. (2004). Marketing: Essential Principles, New Realities. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
Needles, B., Powers, M., & Crosson, S. (2013). Financial and Managerial Accounting. Mason: Cengage Learning.
Ramaswamy. (2013). Marketing Management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Smith, P. R., & Taylor, J. (2004). Marketing Communications: An Integrated Approach. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
Stershic, S. F. (2012). Share of Mind, Share of Heart: Marketing Tools of Engagement for Nonprofits. WME Books.



Thursday, June 22, 2017

Facebook Usage Worldwide

People from Canada, India and the United States, we have witnessed the dramatic use of social media, especially Facebook, in all our countries over the past ten years.
Facebook is undoubtedly the most popular and widespread of all the social media programs worldwide, with 1.32 billion monthly users, of which more than a billion are now using the service at least partly on mobile devices. (Albergotti, 2014) (Guynn, 2014)
In its latest quarterly report in July 2014, Facebook announced that the service had added an additional 40 million users in the second quarter, with one-fifth of the world's population now logging into the social network at least once a month. In addition, Facebook reported that more than 81 percent of its users are outside Canada and the United States.
Facebook definitely has had its share of criticism, with complaints about lack of privacy, secret experiments on users, and immoral and/or inappropriate content. In fact, in countries such as Argentina, India, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the governments have either threatened to or actually have blocked Facebook usage for periods of time, accusing the service of “inciting hate and panic,” attacking government leaders, or ignoring religious values. (“Facebook blocked in”, 2014) (Lakshmi, 2102) As recently as last month (July 2014), a mob in Pakistan killed a woman and two young girls, in the aftermath of an allegedly “blasphemous” Facebook post. (Raza Hassan, 2014)
Meanwhile, in the United States, the media has charged that Facebook is losing its “cool factor” among the younger demographic, with more than three million young teenagers quitting the platform over the past three years.  In fact, Facebook’s penetration among U.S. college-aged adults (age 18 to 24) decreased by three percentage points from 91.5% to 88.6 percent in Nov. 2013 from Feb. 2013, while usage by older 55+ individuals increased. (Saul, 2014)
Still despite such disparagement, use of Facebook continues to expand worldwide. Daily active users increased 19 % percent over last year. Facebook grew revenue 61% and the company more than doubled second-quarter profits as of June 2014.
Moreover, in the past year, the number of users accessing Facebook on smartphones and tablets, has dramatically increased. Daily mobile users were up 39% year over year; and monthly mobile active users increased 14 % over 2013. Currently, 62% of the company’s advertising revenue comes from ads on mobile devices. (Goel, 2014)



REFERENCES
Albergotti, R. (2014, July 23). Facebook answers critics with mobile-ad surge. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/articles/facebook-results-keep-surging-on-mobile-ad-growth-1406146246
Facebook blocked in Saudi Arabia. (2010, November 13). The News 24. Retrieved from http://www.news24.com/SciTech/News/Facebook-blocked-in-Saudi-Arabia-20101113
Guynn, J. (2014, July 23). Facebook revenue jumps 61% on mobile ad strength. The USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/07/23/facebook-earnings/13045633/
Goel, V. (2014, July 23). Facebook’s profit propelled by mobile. The New York TimesRetrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/technology/facebooks-profit-soars-past-expectations-fueled-by-mobile-ads.html?_r=0
Lakshmi, R. (2012, August 20). India blocks more than 250 Web sites for inciting hate, panic. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/india-blocks-more-than-250-web-sites-for-inciting-hate-panic/2012/08/20/aee0b846-eadf-11e1-866f-60a00f604425_story.html
India leads worldwide social networking growth. (2013, November 19). Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/India-Leads-Worldwide-Social-Networking-Growth/1010396
Raza Hassan, S. (2014, May 14). Pakistan mob kills woman, girls, over 'blasphemous' Facebook post. The MSN. Retrieved from http://news.msn.com/world/pakistan-mob-kills-woman-girls-over-blasphemous-facebook-post
Saul, D. (2014, January 14). 3 Million Teens leave Facebook In 3 years: The 2014 Facebook demographic report. Retrieved From http://istrategylabs.com/2014/01/3-million-teens-leave-facebook-in-3-years-the-2014-facebook-demographic-report/
Social networking popular across globe. (2012, December 12). Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/12/12/social-networking-popular-across-globe/
Smith, C. (2013, November 16). 7 Statistics about Facebook users that reveal why it's such a powerful marketing platform. The Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/a-primer-on-facebook-demographics-2013-10

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Moody's Credit Rating

Moody’s credit rating looks at the probability of a debt instrument defaulting and the amount of loss this default will cause on the debt-holder. Moody’s credit ratings are expressed in terms of letters and numbers (United States, 2011). The characters range from AAA to C forming twenty-one categories. A rating of AAA means that the expected credit loss is at its lowest. A is the highest intrinsic financial strength.
           Moody’s credit rating does not address the possibility of prepayment, particular securities being relatively valued, risk of liquidity, terms and the price during the investment process. Moody being the oldest rating agency in the world played a role in the subprime mortgage meltdown which made investors lose confidence in Moody. As a result of the subprime mortgage meltdown, initiatives that promote market transparency and rating of rating agencies have been implemented (United States et.al, 2011).
Moody’s credit rating has its limitation. It only assesses the risk of credit loss which is important to investors when buying a security. However, a security is affected by other factors other than credit such as currency risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk (Darbellay, 2013). If the Moody credit rating is used alone, it is a vague and incomplete substitution for the price of a security.
           Part of the problem is ideological. At the most basic level, the combined income of all three sectors of an economy - the domestic private sector (including households and businesses), the government sector, and the foreign sector – must equal its expenditures. Sectors in the economy that are net issuing new financial liabilities are matched by sectors willingly owning new financial assets (Mattarocci, 2013). This is not only true of the income and expenditure sides of the equation, but also the financing side, which is rarely well integrated into macro analysis. But the neoliberals hate the idea of placing the government sector on par with the private and external sectors (Mattarocci, 2013). They view it as an unwanted appendage which adversely afflicts the operation of the private sector in a “free market” economy.
           Moody’s credit rating relies on documentation of macroeconomic factors, scenarios and third parties. Moody should enhance transparency in relation to the assumptions they obtain from this documents. In conjunction with Moody’s credit rating, additional measurement tools should be developed that go beyond expected credit loss to include structured finance market pricing services and valuation (Deventer, 2013). This sets the groundwork for structured products by strengthening the secondary market (Great Britain, 2009).
           There are measures instituted to protect the integrity of Moody’s credit rating as stipulated in their code of professional conduct (Lawrence &Weber, 2011). However, Moody should work at further enhancing the conflict of interest protections. There should be clear disclosure of rating agencies performance metrics, procedures and methodologies (Mattarocci, 2013).




References
Darbellay, A. (2013). Regulating credit rating agencies. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar.
Deventer, D. R. (2013). Advanced financial risk management: Tools and techniques for   integrated credit risk and interest rate risk management. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
Great Britain. (2009). Local authority investments: Report, together with formal minutes.  London: TSO.
Lawrence, A.T., Weber, J. (2011). The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business &  society: stakeholders, ethics, public policy (13th Ed.) (pp. 50). New York: McGraw- Hill/Irwin
Mattarocci, G. (2013). The Independence of Credit Rating Agencies: How Business Models and  Regulators Interact. Burlington: Elsevier Science.
United States, Levin, C., & Coburn, T. A. (2011). Wall Street and the financial crisis: Anatomy   of a financial collapse. New York: Cosimo Reports.
United States. (2011). The financial crisis inquiry report: Final report of the National       Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States.  New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Starbucks Coffee Company: Transformation and Renewal


The coffee industry has significantly changed, and the strategies that conventionally worked in 1970s and 1980s may no longer work. Traditionally Starbucks purchased and sold only high-quality coffee at a premium price. However, the coffee experience that was special in the last decades is no longer unique, and the company has failed to recognize these changes in customer tastes and preferences. Additionally, competition has increased, and there are competitors selling the same quality of coffee at a lower price. Starbuck’s attempt to make its coffee special will only harm its sales volume as consumers will buy from competitors (Giovannucci, 2001). Below is a graph for annual revenue performance per employee in the four major coffee dealers in the U.S.
The coffee industry has changed and the decision to close 600 stores in 2007 is an indication that the company needs to change its current strategy. After conducting an industry analysis with the help of Porter Five Forces, it is clear that competition and Fair trade have affected our business. The analysis revealed that the young coffee consumers are not as sensitive to coffee taste as the elderly users. Additionally, the varieties of beverages have increased, and they offer alternatives to coffee (Batsell, 2001).
The analysis indicated that the reasons for the decline in the Starbucks’ sale are that the older generation that valued the club-like environment over a cup of coffee has reduced significantly (McClure, 1999). The decision to introduce so many products affected the trust that customers had on the integrity of Starbucks’ coffee. Finally, the process of creating new stores was not well thought-out, and it only created an imaginary growth while the fundamentals of the business remained the same or deteriorated (Mathew, 2008).
I recommend closing of more stores, reduce our product lines and change our target market from the specialty to mass branding.
Closing more stores in the U.S., China and Europe will help the company reduce operational costs. The company has been making losses in most of the recently opened shops, and they should all close. The company needs to sell these stores so that it can use the money to aggressively market its products and fund research and development (Pendergrast, 1999).
The company should reduce its product line to earn back the trust from the coffee lovers. The perception of the quality of Starbucks coffee has been affected by the many brands. By specializing in two or three brands will make the marketing activities easier and cheaper. The company will not have to employ so many promoters for its coffee (Quelch, 2008).
In the current market conditions, most customers are sensitive to the product prices and not the quality. It is essential that the company find ways of reducing the cost of production of our coffee so that we can decrease the price of coffee. Our prices should be able to compete with competitors’.
These changes are critical for Starbucks’ survival and its future performance. Failure to take these corrective measures will see the company share price continue to go down, and this may attract a hostile takeover, and the company will be no more. Competitors are watching keenly into the problems of Starbucks, and are eagerly waiting for the strategy the company will take so that they can decide on their next move. Starbucks dominance in the coffee industry in the past creates a feeling of success among hostile investors. Some have waited for a long time for the current situation to occur so that they can take over the company at a cheap price.





 References

Batsell, J. (2001). Starbucks Achieves Worldwide Renown with Some Costs. The Seattle
Times. 83(2), 33-37.
Gill, D. (2013). Starbucks Shares Looking Frothy; Where is Howard’s Head? Retrieved on 06th June 2015 from http://ycharts.com/analysis/story/starbucks_shares_looking_frothy_where_is_howards_head
Giovannucci, D. (2001). Sustainable Coffee Survey of the North American Specialty Coffee
Industry. New York Times. 15(2), 25-32.
Mathew, L. (2008). The decline of the empire of Starbucks. Retrieved on 06th June 2015 from http://www.spectator.co.uk/columnists/any-other-business/852391/the-decline-of-the-empire-of-starbucks
McClure, R. (1999). Starbucks soon to have it Made in the Shade. Seattle-Post Intelligencer. 3(2), 53-67.
Pendergrast, M. (1999). Uncommon Grounds: The History of Coffee and How It Transformed our world. New York: Basic Books.
Quelch, J. (2008). How Starbucks’ growth destroyed brand value. Retrieved on 06th June 2015 from https://hbr.org/2008/07/how-starbucks-growth-destroyed
http://ycharts.com/analysis/story/starbucks_shares_looking_frothy_where_is_howards_head