Thursday, July 20, 2017

Kind Bar Company



Protein bars are popular among health enthusiasts, athletes, people too busy to eat a proper meal and those looking for a healthy option to the mid-afternoon chocolate break. The many types of protein bars – meal replacement bars, energy bars – each contain different amounts of protein, fats and carbohydrates. Because customers are always looking for variety, there is still plenty of room for new protein bars on the market, especially in niche areas, such as gluten free, organic and even kosher
But Kind bars have rapidly become a serious competitor in the snack food industry. The fruit-and-nut snack is the fastest-growing energy and nutrition bar in the country and can be found in 80,000 locations nationally. Sales were close to $120 million in 2012, the privately held company says. That’s up from about $10 million in 2010, according to an estimate by market intelligence firm Euromonitor International.
Yet to simply state the company’s store count and growing revenues does not come close to describing the product’s omnipresent feel. Kind bars are showing up in in locations where they are the only bar — or sometimes even the only food product — for sale. When you board an Amtrak train, Kind bars are the only bars around. When you go to work, Kind bars may be placed out for free by your employer if not available for sale at the company cafeteria. When you go out to grab milk at the convenience store, Kind bars will stare you in the face at the register. When you go to a hockey or basketball game, Kind bars are sold next to the pizza and beer. And when you’re checking out at Bed Bath & Beyond  BBBY -0.98% , Jamba Juice  JMBA -2.09% , or Au Bon Pain, Kind bars are right there too.
All the standout places you may find a Kind bar are just one piece of the product’s extensive distribution network. A snack that was once available in just 1,000 specialty grocery stores like Whole Foods  WFM -0.87% , Kind is now sold right next to its competition — mainly Clif Bar, General Mills  GIS -2.16% , and Kellogg’s  K -2.47%  — in more than 50 major U.S. chains including Trader Joe’s, Wal-Mart  WMT -1.17% , Target  TGT -1.27% , Costco  COST -1.07% , and 7-Eleven.
Kind bars’ distribution has grown so quickly that Lubetzky admits he is sometimes caught off guard when he walks into a store and sees his product on the shelf. “It is impossible not to find it once in a while in a place where you are [surprised],” says Lubetzky. He insists that he isn’t blindly saturating markets. He says Kind has been profitable with positive cash flow since the beginning. And he insists the company has to be methodical about putting the bars in outlets where they will actually sell, because they contain nuts and can go stale. “We want Kind to be available everywhere that our consumers are likely to look for us and not anywhere else.”
In the cutthroat competition for shelf space, it is a bit of a mystery how exactly the company is beating out its larger competitors. Several big retailers contacted by Fortunedeclined to discuss Kind. Naturally, Lubetzky attributes the bars’ ability to get shelf space primarily to their taste and how quickly they sell. Out of the 2,000 products in the nutritional bar category, six of the top 10 fastest-selling products are Kind bars, according to data from Nielsen provided to the company. (A representative from Nielsen said she could not share the data directly with Fortune due to client agreements).
“That data sells the shelf space itself,” Lubetzky says, noting that sales have doubled on average in each of the last four years.
Kind also relies in part on Lubetzky’s original mission — spreading kindness — to drive awareness of the product. Rather than rely strictly on direct sampling, company employees are now distributing plastic cards that are meant to reward random acts of kindness. If they see a person doing a kind act like giving up a seat on the subway or helping an elderly pedestrian across the street, they give the do-gooder the card. In turn, Kind will send the samaritan a couple bars as well as another card to pay the kindness forward to someone else. The company, which calls itself “not-only-for profit,” also has pledged thousands annually to support customer-generated projects that give back to the community.
“We found a way that seems authentic to honor kindness, to inspire kindness, and to get more people to try the product,” says Lubetzky, who is also the founder of an organization called PeaceWorks that works to create business relationships in conflict regions.
During the company’s formative years, Lubetzky could barely pay himself a $24,000 salary, let alone invest in getting more people to try the product. Then in 2008, private equity firm VMG Partners invested in the company, although it will not disclose the amount.
Kind bars were sold in just 20,000 locations when VMG got involved. The investors immediately put their capital to work to get the product into more people’s hands with free samples. Lubetzky’s sampling budget was $800 in 2008, and he was reluctant to increase it, but by 2009 that budget ballooned to $800,000. Today, Kind spends upwards of $10 million in efforts to get people to try Kind bars. The company has a full-time field marketing team in 25 U.S. markets that organizes sampling in stores, sponsoring sporting events, taking free samples into corporate offices and putting them in gift bags at company events.
Kind is also surfing a trend in American eating preferences. A decade ago, energy and nutrition bars were largely considered a specialty product purchased only by dieters or athletes, according to a report by Euromonitor. Today, a new type of consumer looking for healthy and easy-to-eat snacks has emerged. Americans continue to spend less and less of their paychecks on food and shy away from paying top dollar for an expensive meal out, says Harry Balzer, an industry analyst at consumer market research company NPD Group. Portable bars that purport to be healthy and filling, like Kind, fulfill a growing need. Roughly 27 million more Americans ate bars in 2013 than in 2003,
In a place where there is no humanity, strive thou to be human.” Ultimately, Lubetzky believes that Kind can continue to gain distribution and become a top food brand — not just bar brand — in the aggressive food industry while still doing the “kind” thing. Kind bars may already be in 80,000 stores across the country, but Lubetzky said he can envision that number one day growing as large as 300,000.
First, he said his biggest challenge is to expand his customer base even further. While 77% of Kind customers eat more than one bar a day, 80% of Americans are still completely clueless about the product, according to the company. The founder hopes to further his following with new offerings including both granola bars and bags of granola.
If he is successful, Kind products won’t stop showing up in surprising places anytime soon.

“Kind bars are an iconic product,” said Whole Foods executive global grocery coordinator Errol Schweizer. “Like Cheerios or Kool Aid or Kraft Singles — except a lot better for you.”


Thursday, July 13, 2017

Carlson Company





Enhancing the welfare and interests of the communities being served is one of the responsibilities that every organization has in any given the environment that it establishes itself. A consideration of expanding luxury Regency accommodations and services, in 2006, to Costa Rica is a decision that would put Carlson Companies in a dilemma of solving a social problem that the community was facing. The surrounding area of the resort was facing a disreputable issue of child trafficking and prostitution, and despite the venture being profitable it is a dilemma that the company should address as it prepares to approve the project. This is a position that is supported by the signed Code of Conduct, which aims at protecting vulnerable Children in relation to sexual exploitation being carried out in Travel and Tourism (Linde & Eisenbeis, 2011).

It is evident that despite the existing challenges, there are associated with the decision of developing the hotel in Costa Rica. They include:  A lucrative business opportunity is presented in building the hotel. It is the opportunity of serving as a role model and positive force in the travel and tourism business. An opportunity of demonstrating the feasibility of the project to others in the industry and the rest of the world upon meeting socially responsible hotel management challenges. Training hotel employees will empower them in monitoring and acting against any form of children exploitation in Carlson hotels. Carlson Company will also experience an increase in revenue with the commencement of the proposed project.

Different concerns have been raised in relation to the enforcement of the code and the feasibility of suggested project of Carlson’s Regent resort. One of the concern has to do with the full enforcement of the code upon the completion of the resort, a case whereby it is hard for Carson to guarantee the needed children protection within the hotel. The second concern is associated with the implications of the Marriott child sex trafficking case, which happened in a similar environment that Carlson is seeking to establish itself in Costa Rica. A third concern is the possibility of Carlson’s Regent Hotel being associated with child sex trafficking by the international community on the basis that the resort is located in Costa Rica. Finally, there is a concern of the resort failing to meet the obligations established under the Code. This would lead to a situation whereby Carlson is risking public censure, mainly from the monitoring body of the Code (Linde & Eisenbeis, 2011).

In trying to maximize the highlighted benefits of the project and addressing the above concerns, the following are some of the critical recommendations that should be adopted for the success of the project implementation to be realized.  Carlson Company should continue showing commitment towards the implementation of the code as it is not an easy task to undertake. The hotel resort should commit towards the suggested measures, through the determined Code and work-related policies, in creating the environment that is intolerant with the issue of child sex trafficking. This is an effort that will sustain its reputation as an international company that is respected.  Carlson Nelson should carry out a comprehensive analysis of the risks associated with the decision of proceeding with the project. Effective implementation of the stated Code of Conduct within the hotel will reduce any chance of facing litigation because the issue of child molestation in the company’s hotels will be dealt with in a more appropriate way.  






References
Altinay, L., Saunders, M. N., & Wang, C. L. (2014). The Influence of Culture on Trust Judgments in Customer Relationship Development by Ethnic Minority Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(1), 59-78.
Buck, W. F. (2015). A Competitive Business Ethics Simulation Game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 42.
Li, C. L. (2009). Managing business relationship development: A cross-cultural perspective. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 14(2), 123-148.
Linde, R., & Eisenbeis, H. R. (2011). The Carlson Company and Global Corporate Citizenship: The Protection of Children in the Travel and Tourism Industry. Case Research Journal, 31(2): 1-11.
Lovelock, C. H., Patterson, P., & Wirtz, J. (2015). Services marketing. Frenchs Forest, N.S.W. Pearson Australia.
Margolis, J. (2008). Why companies fail. Employment Relations Today, 35(1), 9-17.

Wirtz, J., Chew, P., & Lovelock, C. H. (2012). Essentials of services marketing. Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia.